171 articles• Page 1 of 18
Use this Article 4 evidence benchmark to test whether your AI literacy file is defensible: roles, risks, training records, scores and management reporting.
Read moreLinkedIn Recruiter and Talent Insights deploy AI heavily: Recommended Matches, AI-assisted messaging, Hiring Assistant. Almost every EU employer uses it — almost none have it in their AI register.
Read moreWorkforce analytics, time-tracking AI, productivity scoring, sentiment analysis, attrition prediction: almost all modern monitoring tools hit Annex III point 4(b). Practical overview.
Read moreUse the readiness score to decide whether classification, evidence, training or governance comes first.
No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
The European Commission's draft guidelines make HR AI more concrete: CV ranking, targeted job ads, assessments and worker management now need defensible classification.
Read moreHiBob's Bob is popular with Dutch scale-ups thanks to UX and flexibility. The AI layer (Bob AI, talent scoring, sentiment) changes the classification question under the EU AI Act.
Read moreWorkforce planning AI suggests team structures, predicts capacity and can be input for restructuring. Annex III point 4(b) plus works council law plus labor law: the stacking is heaviest here.
Read moreAFAS deliberately takes a cautious position on AI. For Dutch employers using Profit and Insite that is reassuring on the surface — but the classification question does not disappear.
Read moreA structured overview of the eight domains of Annex III AI Act based on the Commission guidelines of 19 May 2026, with use cases, examples of high-risk systems and the application of the Article 6(3) filter per domain.
Read moreOn 19 May 2026 the European Commission released its draft guidelines for the classification of high-risk AI systems. A deep dive into the Article 6(3) filter, the eight Annex III domains, and the three pitfalls every provider and deployer needs to understand.
Read moreDomain 1 of Annex III AI Act covers three use cases: remote biometric identification, biometric categorisation and emotion recognition. The Commission guidelines draw sharp distinctions between what is prohibited under Article 5, what is high-risk and what is out of scope.
Read more